Analyzing Students’ Mathematical Communication Failure Through ChatGPT-Assisted Scaffolding Based on Cognitive Styles

Authors

  • Zulaika Daningtyas Master's Program in Mathematics Education, Universitas Jambi, Jambi, Indonesia Author
  • Nizlel Huda Master's Program in Mathematics Education, Universitas Jambi, Jambi, Indonesia Author
  • Syamsir Sainuddin Master's Program in Mathematics Education, Universitas Jambi, Jambi, Indonesia Author

Keywords:

Cognitive style, Mathematical communication, Scaffolding, ChatGPT, Sequences and series

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the forms of students’ mathematical communication failure in sequences and series and to examine how ChatGPT functions as adaptive scaffolding for students with Field Dependent (FD) and Field Independent (FI) cognitive styles. This study employed a qualitative case study design involving four eleventh-grade students selected purposively based on the Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT). Data were collected through mathematical communication tests, think-aloud protocols, and semi-structured interviews. The analysis was based on mathematical communication indicators proposed by the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) and Greenes and Schulman. During problem-solving activities, ChatGPT was used as an adaptive scaffolding tool by providing guiding questions, conceptual clarification, and reflective prompts rather than direct answers. The findings revealed that FD students experienced difficulties in symbolic formalization and connecting representations, whereas FI students tended to provide incomplete explanations and verification processes. ChatGPT-assisted scaffolding supported each cognitive style differently by helping FD students formalize mathematical ideas and encouraging FI students to explain and verify their reasoning more explicitly. These findings contribute to mathematics learning innovation by demonstrating how AI-based adaptive scaffolding can provide personalized support according to students’ cognitive characteristics and improve mathematical communication during problem solving.

References

Çakar Özkan, E. (2022). Scaffolding as teachers’ guidance role in the context of constructivist learning Approach. Journal of Educational Issues, 8(1), 399. https://doi.org/10.5296/jei.v8i1.19690

Daningtyas, Z., Huda, N., & Sainuddin, S. (2025). Mapping research trends in mathematical communication: A bibliometric review using VOSviewer. Journal of General Education and Humanities, 4(4), 1913–1928. https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v4i4.775

Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1–2), 103–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-0400-z

Esparcia, J., López, M., & García, R. (2024). Scaffolding strategies in mathematics learning: Supporting mathematical communication and reasoning. Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 16(2), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11185028

Genç, M., Yıldız, A., & Kaya, S. (2025). Students’ mathematical communication and representation skills in problem-solving activities. Mathematics Education Review, 37(1), 45–61.

Hofer, S. I., & Reinhold, F. (2025). Scaffolding of learning activities: Aptitude-treatment interaction effects in math? Learning and Instruction, 99, 102177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102177

Huda, N., Anwar, K., . N., & Kurniawan, W. (2025). Chatgpt scaffolding in supporting metacognition for limit concepts in guided inquiry mathematics learning. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 24, 038. https://doi.org/10.28945/5645

Ismaimuza, D., Nusantara, T., & Parta, I. N. (2024). Cognitive styles and students’ mathematical communication in problem-solving. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(1), 85–100.http://doi.org/10.55463/issn.1674-2974.51.8.1

Lehmann, T., & Lesley, K. (2025). Written mathematical explanations and students’ argumentation quality in secondary mathematics classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 12(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-025-10590-7

NCTM. (2020). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en

OECD. (2021). 21st-century readers: Developing literacy skills in a digital world. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a83d84cb-en

Pepin, B., Buchholtz, N., & Salinas-Hernández, U. (2025). A scoping survey of chatgpt in mathematics education. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 11(1), 9–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-025-00172-1

Planas, N., & Pimm, D. (2024). Mathematical communication and discourse in contemporary mathematics classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 115(2), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01497-0

Rehman, A., Abdullah, N., & Karim, S. (2023). Students’ difficulties in mathematical communication and representation. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 11(3), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01914-5

Salam, R., & Khusna, H. (2025). Differences in mathematical communication between field dependent and field independent students. Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, 13(1), 22–34. https://dx.doi.org/10.26594/jmpm.v10i1.5605

Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. Cambridge University Press.

Suhenda, A., & Munandar, D. R. (2023). Students’ mathematical communication difficulties in connecting multiple representations. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 17(1), 55–68. http://10.31949/educatio.v9i2.5049

Thomann, H., & Deutscher, V. (2025). Scaffolding through prompts in digital learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness on learning achievement. Educational Research Review, 47, 100686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100686

Tong, D. H., Loc, N. P., & Uyen, B. P. (2021). Enhancing mathematical communication through contextual learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), 745–756. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.3.1287

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wang, X., Li, Y., & Zhao, H. (2024). Artificial intelligence in mathematics education: Adaptive feedback and reflective learning. Computers & Education, 205, 104902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124167

Wardat, Y., Tashtoush, M. A., & AlAli, R. (2023). ChatGPT and mathematics education: Opportunities and challenges for teaching and learning. Education Sciences, 13(9), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13272

Witkin, H. A. (1973). The role of cognitive style in academic performance and learning. Research Bulletin, 73–11.

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x

Downloads

Published

2026-07-21